Main Menu

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 20, 2014, 11:40:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length


Run Count
2014FireEMS
Jan62146
Feb60147
Mar59125
Apr55146
May55174
Jun48168
Jul59161
Aug58159
Sep55140
Oct64132
Nov60133
Dec00
Total6351631

2013FireEMS
Jan70154
Feb49152
Mar55108
Apr43146
May70132
Jun59143
Jul65127
Aug35121
Sep52133
Oct48148
Nov46132
Dec51135
Total6431631

Welcome

Welcome To Our Home


   

Nov 12 2014 Our Public Education Program In Action
written by davidhaase | 64 Views

This is one classes video of what they learned after one of our Public Education Programs!


>
1010 Views
Winter heating devices can increase the risk of carbon monoxide.  ...Read More
Jan 01 2014 Home Heating Safety
843 Views
Winter brings images of cozy, warm nights at home, but it also can be a season when families may be at a higher risk of home fires.   ...Read More
378 Views
By: Sarah Blazonis Updated 08/11/2014 10:46 PM

mfddb6fd261-c1a9-4748-b117-d87406a6863b


MANLIUS, N.Y. -- From medical supplies stored in tiny closets to a small and outdated decontamination area, Manlius Mayor Paul Whorrall says the village's fire stations are in definite need of updates.

"We've outgrown both stations, and they don't meet the needs. They don't meet the needs of the career staff, they don't meet the needs of our volunteer staff," said Whorrall.

The station's 70 volunteer members were a big part of the reason officials chose this site at the corner of Route 92 and Enders Road in the town instead of a dozen other locations for the new station it plans to build. Officials say it's a more central location that would allow for better response times and other benefits.

"It'll give them the opportunity to have better training facilities, allow them to train at a higher level," said Village of Manlius Fire Chief John Buskey.

Village residents were supposed to head to the polls later this month to decide on whether or not to buy this plot of land, but village officials say a disagreement with the Town of Manlius has postponed that vote indefinitely.

Whorrall says both the village and town want to be lead environmental agency on the project. Postponing the vote until the DEC reaches a decision on the matter puts the village in a tough spot. Its contract with the property's current owner giving it the option to buy the land is up at the end of the month.

"Our chances of losing that property will make us have to go back to square one," said Whorrall. "Right now, we -- I feel, personally -- would be doing an injustice to the community if I said, 'Oh, well, we can just pick one of the other sites."

Whorrall said $450,000 has already been put into the project that could total $9.5 million once it's finished. If they're not able to build on the site, renovations for the existing stations would likely be the back-up plan, but officials say those improvements wouldn't fully meet the department's needs.

If construction of a new station does move forward, the mayor said the current stations would be sold to help with building expenses.

Officials with the Town of Manlius did not respond to requests for comment.
- See more at: http://centralny.twcnews.com/content/news/760235/village-of-manlius-fire-station-project-hits-road-block/#sthash.LirIiRX7.dpuf

144 Views

Do you have a Kidde combination smoke/CO detector in your home?? Better check! Smoke/CO alarms save lives...but only if they work! Check yours now!


Kidde Smoke/CO Alarm

Recall Summary

Name of product:

Kidde hard-wired smoke and combination smoke/carbon monoxide (CO) alarms

Hazard:

The alarms could fail to alert consumers of a fire or a CO incident following a power outage.

Consumer Contact:

Kidde toll-free at (844) 553-9011 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday or online at www.kidde.com and click on Recalls for more information.

Report an Incident Involving this Product
242 Views
First Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 -11:42 a.m

Manlius town board and zoning board members discuss disagreement with village over lead agency status for proposed new fire station

Manlius_FD_web_t670

— Town of Manlius government leaders said last week the village of Manlius is squeezing them out of the planning process for the proposed new fire station at the corner of Enders Road and Route 92, even though the site of the new station is entirely outside the village.

The Manlius town board and town zoning board of appeals held a joint public meeting last week about the issue and, after receiving information and guidance from the town attorney, both agreed to consider the situation and make decisions about project jurisdiction at their respective upcoming meetings.

The town and village have been at odds over the project since the village board unanimously passed resolutions in late June declaring their “municipal sovereignty” from the town and seeking immunity from town regulations as they try to bring the fire station project to fruition. While the village is charged with providing fire protection to the town, the land for the proposed station is on town land.

“This has to do with the sovereignty of the process,” said Manlius Town Supervisor Ed Theobald. “We do want to make this work, but we want to do it the right way.”

“The concern is, why wouldn’t the town board have jurisdiction over this like any other project in the town?” said town attorney Steve Primo.

Manlius Mayor Paul Whorrall, who attended the meeting but did not speak, said the next day, “I took away from the meeting exactly why, after six months, there is no inter-municipal agreement. If it’s going to be this long and arduous climate, couldn’t they just turn around and say it’s not appropriate to build the fire station there? That’s exactly our concern.”

Until one of the municipalities — either the village or the town — is declared the “lead agency” in terms of the state-mandated environmental impact review process of the project (State Environmental Quality Review Act, or SEQR), the project cannot get started.

Background

The village has spent nearly seven years — and more than $440,000 — working to improve the fire station situation.

Manlius currently has two fire stations, station 1, which is located on Stickley Drive, and station 2, on Pompey Center Road. The village spent six years — from 2007 to 2013 — investigating the possibility of renovating both fire stations due to the deteriorating conditions and lack of sufficient facilities, such as restrooms, cleaning facilities, bunk rooms and overall handicapped accessibility. Both stations have issues that require remediation to ensure the “health and safety” of emergency personnel, Whorrall has said.

After numerous studies and much deliberation, the village Fire Facilities Committee decided to take the plans of what was needed at the two stations and combined them into one 20,000-square-foot building, which is proposed to be located at the corner of Enders Road and Route 92.

The new station would become the hub for all Manlius fire personnel, and the proposed location would be right in the middle of the Manlius fire district, which reaches south into the town of Pompey and as far east as the border of the town of Sullivan. The location would not only be more central in terms of response time to emergencies, but also for emergency responders to reach the station when they are called to respond to a situation, Whorrall said.

The proposal for a single, consolidated station was announced last September.

The village has been paying the landowner, Walrus Enterprises, $1,000 a month to hold the four-acre property at Enders and Route 92 for the village. That contract expired at the end of August, and the village had hoped to hold a village referendum on bonding for the new fire station before that expiration, but no vote occurred because the village and town could not come to an inter-municipal agreement. As a result of the six-month delay and the need to move the project forward, the village board voted unanimously on June 24 to declare its municipal sovereignty from the town.


On July 1, the mayor and village clerk were invited to the town board’s regular meeting to discuss the village’s position. Town Supervisor Ed Theobald said afterward that the town board still had “major concerns” about the issue, and would make a decision by the end of July. The town board never made an official decision, but it did vote to object to the village’s application for lead agency status under the SEQR, and sent a letter to the state Department of Environmental Conservation stating its objection.

In the meantime, the village’s contract with Walrus Enterprises expired, although it has been extended while this issue continues, Whorrall said.

Joint meeting

At the joint town board and zoning board of appeals meeting last week, Primo told the two assembled boards that the purpose of the meeting was to make a determination as to the town’s jurisdiction in the fire station proposal, specifically as to the village’s assertion of sovereign immunity and exemption from town regulations. He said the board also had to decide whether the project should be allowed to go forward without the town being named lead agency for SEQR review.

Primo said the boards needed to discuss the “balancing test” criteria as related to one municipality declaring sovereignty from another for a specific project, and laid out nine criteria as set forth in the main legal precedent case on the issue, Monroe County v. City of Rochester, from 1988. Those criteria included items such as considering alternate project locations, alternate methods to provide project improvement, impact on legitimate local interests and the extent of inter-governmental participation in the project.

“The procedural law is not that clear” to help make a determination in this case, Primo said. “It is somewhat confusing and it is unique.”

Primo said that from his perspective, once the village adopted its June resolution of sovereign immunity, the town does not even have “involved agency” status in project planning and zoning decisions. “We’re looking for some give-back,” he said.


Other town board members agreed.

Councilor Nicholas Marzola said the town board is concerned about having “at least some say and standing in the process,” and having an opportunity to review all the necessary project information and studies.

Councilor John Loeffler said there is a concern that, while the SEQR process is always the same, different boards can reach different outcomes in how they answer the SEQR questions based on their specific concerns. He said the boards’ decision was about what was the “right process” and “best approach” to the question of whether the village or the town is the lead agency for SEQR review and, ultimately, chooses how the process is administered and accomplished.

Theobald said he had heard from town constituents that because the proposed fire station is on town property the town should be named lead agency and the project should go through the town zoning and planning process.

“There are checks and balances here — there are due diligence issue by us, the town board,” he said. “We want to do everything we can to make this work, but we must do it correctly and do it together.”

Village attorney Matt Kerwin told the joint meeting that the village is “committed to this project and sees it as crucial to improve and maintain emergency services in the village and town alike.” He said the village board is dedicated to working together with the town. “I think there’s a solution to be found here among everyone,” he said.

Ultimately, the state DEC will make a determination as to who the lead agency will be for the fire station project, Whorrall said, although he has no idea which way the DEC may decide to go.

If the DEC chooses the village as lead agency, they will work together with the town board on the project; if the DEC chooses the town to lead, then the village board will have to discuss that decision with its attorney and decide the best way to move forward, Whorrall said.

“We will work with [the town], as we have all along; we’ve never left them,” he said. “What they’re willing to do, we don’t know.”

As to why the village and town are arguing over this if the DEC is making the decision anyway, Manlius Village Clerk Martha Dygert said it is her understanding that if the town disputes the lead agency issue now, then if the DEC chooses the village the town can challenge that decision in court and dispute the village’s claim that the town is not an involved agency.

The two town boards agreed to consider the issue further and vote as boards at their next respective meetings. The next ZBA meeting is Thursday, Sept. 18, while the next town board meeting is on Wednesday, Sept. 24.

Jason Emerson is editor of the Eagle Bulletin. He can be reached at editor@eaglebulletin.com or at 434-8889 ext. 335.


111 Views

First Posted: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 -8:29 a.m.

— The disagreement between the village of Manlius and the town of Manlius over which municipality should be the lead agency to create the proposed new fire station at the corner of Enders Road and Route 92 last week received some direction from the state Department of Environmental Conservation, which issued an opinion in favor of the village.

“Based on my finding that the village has the broadest governmental powers to investigate the impacts of the proposed action by virtue of its control over all aspects of design, construction and operation of the proposed fire station,” the village was designated to serve as lead agency on the fire station project, DEC Commissioner Joseph Martens wrote in his official opinion dated Oct. 14 and delivered to both the village and town of Manlius governments last Friday.

Both town and village officials have been waiting for the DEC decision to come down since the village asked the state environmental agency to make a ruling on the issue in early August. The fire station project, which has been in the works for years but has been stalled throughout 2014 as the two municipalities argued, could not move forward until a municipal agency was declared to be the “lead agency” — or in charge — in terms of the state-mandated environmental impact review process of the project (State Environmental Quality Review Act, or SEQR).

“I’m relieved that a decision was finally made so that we know now that we can move forward, the direction we have to move forward to start getting the project back underway,” said Manlius Mayor Paul Whorrall. “We will work closely with the town and we will do what we have to do that’s required of us with the SEQR review. We’re not going to exclude the town in letting them know what we’re going to do.”

— Manlius Town Supervisor Ed Theobald, on the other hand, said the town board was “somewhat surprised” and “disappointed” that the DEC determined the village should have lead agency status “over property that is outside the village. As the project proposed would serve town and village residents alike and provide a very important public service that the village has clearly determined is needed, the issue is the location and the potential adverse effects on traffic, neighborhood, nearby community character and similar effects addressed by zoning and environmental review laws and regulations.”

The village has spent nearly seven years — and more than $440,000 — working to improve the fire station situation by building one new, state-of-the art station to replace the two outdated stations currently in use. The new station would be an approximately 20,000 square feet building on a 4.1 acre parcel on land to be purchased by the village — although the land is outside the village limits and in the town. The new station would become the hub for all Manlius fire personnel.

The proposal for a single, consolidated station was announced last September, but from January to June this year discussions between village and town officials had stalled. The village board then in June voted unanimously to declare its “municipal sovereignty” from the town and to seek immunity from town regulations as they worked to bring the fire station project to fruition.

The town and village have been at odds over the project ever since.

In his Oct. 14 designation, Martens wrote that he based his lead agency decision on three criteria: the anticipated impacts of the project, which agency had the broadest governmental powers to investigate the impacts of the proposed project and which agency had the greatest capability to provide the most thorough environmental assessment of the proposed project.

— Martens wrote that the first and third criteria apply equally to both village and town, but the second criteria — which agency has the broadest governmental powers to investigate the impacts of the proposed project — Martens found that the village had the broadest authority.

“The village has the greatest ability to change, add and even delete project elements to avoid or reduce such impacts through its control of location, design and finance,” Martens wrote. “The village is in the best position not merely to identify but also to ensure implementation of any measures necessary to avoid or minimize potential impacts from the construction of the proposed fire station as they may be revealed during the environmental review. The village has direct authority over site selection, construction and administration of the proposed facility.”

While Martens clarified one aspect of the fire station argument, he refused to clarify a second one — which municipality has zoning jurisdiction over the land. Martens stated that the land for the proposed fire station may need a zone change in order to allow its use for the fire station. While he acknowledged that the town claims jurisdictional authority and the village claims governmental immunity from zoning, he stated that he accepted both claims as legitimate “for purposes of resolving this dispute.”

For now, the village board will immediately start to move forward on the project, Whorrall said, starting with a fire station committee meeting on Tuesday night, Oct. 21, which occurred after press time, and consultation with the village attorney.

As for the village and town working together to bring the fire station to fruition, Whorrall said, “We’re willing to work with them if they’re willing to work with us. But if they do something I feel is not in the best interests of the people in this community for the best fire service, then I will make other responses.”

— Theobald offered similar sentiments.

“We will continue to try and resolve this amicably with the village, which, by the way, we were working on meeting with to have further discussions with before receiving any word back from the DEC,” Theobald said. “The town board had reserved decision on the jurisdictional issue of application of the town zoning, but now is somewhat ‘boxed in’ and we likely have to proceed by asserting our own jurisdiction. If we do not take these steps we would be disregarding our responsibilities as representatives to our town residents.”

Jason Emerson is editor of the Eagle Bulletin. He can be reached at editor@eaglebulletin.com.

written by davidhaase | 106 Views | Rating: (0 rates)

#Manlius — While the Manlius Town Board will accept a state decision that the village board is the lead agency for construction of the proposed new fire station, town councilors last week unanimously voted to reject the village’s asserted jurisdictional authority over the zoning review aspects of the project and to assert instead the town’s own jurisdiction over zoning.

#Town Supervisor Ed Theobald said the board’s action was just a “procedural process that gets us involved in the zoning review,” however, and that the town will work cooperatively with the village on the entire project.

#“This process is not a fire station issue, it’s a building issue on a parcel of town land with environmental concerns to some of our constituents,” said Councilor Nicholas Marzola.

#The town board’s action came one week after, and in consequence of, a state Department of Environmental Conservation determination that the village of Manlius should be the lead agency for the new fire station project at the corner of Enders Road and Route 92.

#Both town and village officials have been waiting for the DEC decision to come down since the village asked the state environmental agency to make a ruling on the issue in early August. The fire station project, which has been in the works for years but has been stalled throughout 2014 as the two municipalities argued, could not move forward until a municipal agency was declared to be the “lead agency” — or in charge — in terms of the state-mandated environmental impact review process of the project (State Environmental Quality Review Act, or SEQR).

#Town Attorney Steve Primo said the DEC’s Oct. 14 decision left the town board “sort of boxed in.”

#“If you accept the DEC decision then the town board has no involved agency status, no oversight over the project,” Primo told the board during its Oct. 22 meeting. “As a protective measure this asserts our jurisdictional authority.”

— On the village side, the village’s fire station committee had a meeting on Tuesday evening, Oct. 21, to discuss its next actions after the DEC’s lead agency decision from the week before. Mayor Paul Whorrall said the committee decided to “move forward” with the SEQR process, follow all the DEC procedures and set times and dates for public information meetings on the project.

#Whorrall was at the town board’s Oct. 22 meeting, but did not speak.

#“I’m really upset the town delayed this project so long and sent all this paper to Albany for a decision in their favor [from the DEC], and when it didn’t come back in their favor now they’re trying something else,” Whorral said after the meeting. “They requested this go to Albany, but they didn’t get the answer they wanted and now they’ll fight some more. It bothers me that they’re so hell-bent on being the lead agency. I guess it’s about them and not about the health and well-being of the community and the safety of the firefighters.”

#Whorrall said the village plans to move forward with the project, follow all the DEC procedures outlined in its Oct. 14 decision about lead agency and continue working with the town to get the project done. He said the village intends to work with both the village and town planning boards during the zoning review process to make sure both municipalities have input. At least one member of the village fire station committee will also be a representative of the town, he said.

#“We’re willing to work with them, we’re going to work with them [but] they have to stop us if they want to stop us — we’re moving forward,” Whorrall said.

#Jason Emerson is editor of the Eagle Bulletin. He can be reached at editor@eaglebulletin.com or 434-8889 ext. 335.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc